Categories
Review

Freebies or Rights?

Book Review by Bhaskar Parichha

Title: Freebies or Rights: Rethinking India’s Social Policy

Author: Reetika Khera

Publisher: Speaking Tiger Books

The debate over welfare in India has increasingly been reduced to a convenient political binary. Governments announce food, pensions, employment guarantees, healthcare or other forms of support, and critics quickly label them “freebies”. Supporters, in turn, defend them as essential instruments of social justice. Reetika Khera’s Freebies or Rights: Rethinking India’s Social Policy brings into this debate a more fundamental question: Are these programmes merely acts of state generosity, or are they rights that enable citizens to live with dignity?

Khera, an economist known for her extensive work on social policy, approaches the subject through more than two decades of field research. Her concern is not simply with policy as it appears in government documents, but with how it works—or fails to work—in the everyday lives of ordinary Indians. The result is a book that combines empirical research with stories from villages, schools, anganwadis[1], government offices and field surveys.

The book’s scope is deliberately broad. It follows India’s welfare architecture from “cradle to grave”, examining anganwadis and school meals, the Public Distribution System, maternity benefits, pensions, public healthcare and the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). Together, these programmes represent some of the most important ways in which the Indian state intervenes in the lives of citizens, particularly those who have the least economic security.

The book refuses to treat welfare as an abstract contest between competing ideologies. Khera takes the discussion back to the ground. What does a pension mean to an elderly person with no regular income? What difference does a functioning school meal programme make to a child? How does access to subsidised food affect a poor household? What does MGNREGA mean when rural employment is uncertain? Such questions reveal the distance between political rhetoric and lived experience.

Interestingly, the word “freebie” itself comes under scrutiny. The term suggests something given away without obligation or social purpose. Khera challenges this framing by asking whether food, healthcare, education, and basic social security should instead be understood as components of citizenship. A democratic state, in this view, is not simply a provider of occasional relief but an institution with responsibilities towards its citizens.

Also, the book does not make a simplistic case for welfare. Its emphasis on implementation is important. A policy may look progressive on paper and still fail because of corruption, exclusion, inadequate infrastructure, bureaucratic delays or lack of awareness. Rights become meaningful only when citizens can actually access them. This distinction between legislation and delivery is central to understanding India’s welfare experience.

Khera’s field-based approach also helps puncture another familiar argument: that welfare programmes create dependency. The book asks whether social protection can instead expand freedom. An assured source of food, employment, healthcare or a modest pension can give people the security to make choices they otherwise could not afford. Welfare, therefore, may not diminish individual agency; under certain conditions, it can strengthen it.

The book’s larger contribution is to move the welfare debate away from slogans. It invites readers to consider inequality, citizenship and the responsibilities of the state in concrete terms. This makes Freebies or Rights particularly relevant at a time when social spending is frequently discussed through electoral calculations rather than through the experiences of those who depend on it.

Jean Drèze’s observation in the opening—that social policy is too important to be left to experts—captures the spirit of the book. Khera writes for citizens as much as for policymakers and academics. The book does not merely ask readers to accept a particular view of welfare; it equips them to ask better questions.

Freebies or Rights is a case for seeing social protection not as charity, but as part of the infrastructure of a democratic society. Its central message is both simple and consequential: dignity cannot be secured by economic growth alone. For millions of Indians, it also depends on whether the state can make basic rights real in everyday life.

[1] Government-run rural childcare centres in India

.

Bhaskar Parichha is a journalist and author of Cyclones in Odisha: Landfall, Wreckage and Resilience, Unbiased, No Strings Attached: Writings on Odisha and Biju Patnaik – A Political Biography. He lives in Bhubaneswar and writes bilingually. Besides writing for newspapers, he also reviews books on various media platforms.

.

PLEASE NOTE: ARTICLES CAN ONLY BE REPRODUCED IN OTHER SITES WITH DUE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BORDERLESS JOURNAL

Click here to access Wild Winds: The Borderless Anthology of Poems

Click here to access the Borderless anthology, Monalisa No Longer Smiles

Categories
Musings

Just Another Day?

By Farouk Gulsara

Photo Courtesy: Farouk Gulsara

The Sun rears its orangey hue over the horizon. Yet another new day dawns. The Sun does not know it is starting a new horizon. It performs its preordained duty, firing nuclear fusion reactions on its surface. It is the round Earth that revolves around the Sun. The Earth does not know a new day has begun. It just revolves counterclockwise on its axis. It has multiple new dawns at its manufactured latitudes. It neither knows where it started nor its point of reference. A series of celestial accidents brought it to be with its speed and its faithful lunar companion.

The day does not know it is a new day. Wednesday does not know it is Wednesday. It is merely an agreed arrangement for convenience. There is nothing specific about Wednesday or, for that matter, any day. It can rain, shine, snow, or be a non-discrete day. Good or bad things can happen, just like any other day. It is daylight, and night befalls before another day.

Earthlings have been miscalculating their calendars anyway. In 1582, Pope Gregory XIII replaced the Julian calendar with the Gregorian calendar. They realised they had miscalculated the solar cycle and had to remove ten days from the Julian calendars to be in sync with a complete revolution. It took the world three centuries to agree on a single calendar. Imagine the ensuing pandemonium. Sweden had to add two leap days to correct their miscalculations. Imagine finding headstones bearing dates like February 30 or 31 as death dates! So, going back, today’s Wednesday could have been a Saturday in the old Julian calendar.

Different cultures view the beginning of the calendar year at various times, depending on whether they follow a solar, lunar, or lunisolar calculation. The Chinese, who follow a lunar system, celebrate theirs in late January or early February, allowing for leap years. The Persians start theirs, Nowruz, on the summer solstice. The Indians and their Southeast Asian counterparts usher it in April with a water festival, prayers and much merriment. Not to forget the Cambodian despotic leader who established Year 0 on 17th April 1975 to whitewash their glorious past, much like the French Year Zero of the 1789 Bastille Day.

In essence, it is just another day. Just as Paul McCartney described in his song, ‘Another Day‘, one merely slips into shoes on the first day of the calendar and follows the same old routine. That is sad. So, to break the monotony, we attach importance to these days. We start a new ledger or a new school term in some countries. In Malaysia, our school term used to begin on the first Monday of January until COVID-19 befuddled everything. The Education Ministry had to close the schools and postpone examinations. The public examinations used to be done at the end of the year those days. Now, nobody knows when the term begins and when the examinations are written.

Many seize the opportunity to use the new year as leverage to get their lives in order. In the post-inebriation hangover following Christmas and New Year’s Eve, one would vow to become a teetotaller. The resurgence of gym memberships can be observed again. The days into the New Year would see new, eager, wannabe Jane Fondas, who would be MIA by mid-January, often seen arguing at the front desk for a refund.

Life is a continuum; it is not compartmentalised. Though it is good to use the birth of a new year as a fulcrum to springboard oneself to greater heights, any day is a good day to start. All it requires is determination and focus. However, it is easier said than done, and the motivational push varies from person to person. Elements that break the will and opinionated naysayers are aplenty.

Anyway, life will be boring if there are no days to look forward to— no birthdays to shower love, no Christmas to bond, no Harvest Festivals to show gratitude to the forces of Nature, and no New Year’s to make new resolutions for the umpteenth time and break them once again. This makes the world go on. There is always something to look forward to.

Photo Courtesy: Farouk Gulsara

Farouk Gulsara is a daytime healer and a writer by night. After developing his left side of his brain almost half his lifetime, this johnny-come-lately decided to stimulate the non-dominant part of his remaining half. An author of two non-fiction books, Inside the twisted mind of Rifle Range Boy and Real Lessons from Reel Life, he writes regularly in his blog, Rifle Range Boy.

.

PLEASE NOTE: ARTICLES CAN ONLY BE REPRODUCED IN OTHER SITES WITH DUE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BORDERLESS JOURNAL

Click here to access the Borderless anthology, Monalisa No Longer Smiles

Click here to access Monalisa No Longer Smiles on Kindle Amazon International