Categories
Opinion

Rise, You Magnificent Mess

 A love letter to a species that forgot how tall it is by Charudutta Panigrahi

Sistine Chapel. From Public Domain

Somewhere between the first fire and the latest headline, we became the only species that brews its own storm and then complains about the weather.

Look at us. We are astonishing. We split the atom and, with equal aplomb, the family. We decode genomes and each other’s silences. We send a whisper across an ocean in less time than it takes a sigh to leave the chest. And yet, with the very hands that composed the Gita, the sonnets, and the Sistine ceiling, we stir — daily, diligently, almost devotionally — a cauldron of our own making: wars nobody’s grandmother asked for, greed that eats its own children, corruptions dressed as cleverness and efficiencies, cruelties small enough to fit in a comment box and large enough to empty a city. We stoke it. We season it. We simmer in it. And then we tilt our faces to the heavens and ask why life tastes bitter. The other alternative is also given to us, the one to grow vertical to the depth of the spirits, but we prove ‘small’ for that.

The heavens, one imagines, are sorely tempted to echo: taste what you cooked.

Consider the arithmetic of our existence. Stars had to die to donate calcium to our bones; the iron in our blood was forged in the furnace of a supernova; fourteen billion years of cosmic labour conspired to produce this morning’s cup of tea and the warm hand that holds it. Every breath we draw is a loan from a forest. Every heartbeat is an unearned instalment of wonder — roughly a hundred thousand of them a day, delivered free, no invoice attached. Such is the scale of endowment. Life was not achieved by us. It was bestowed upon us, wrapped in dawn, ribboned with birdsong, and signed by something far larger than our petty and fiendish squabbles.

And what do we do with the bestowal? We belittle it. This is our quietest crime. We shrink the miracle until it fits our mood. We measure our irreplaceable days against a neighbour’s car or her flat. We scroll past sunrises to study the grievances of strangers. We audit our blessings for defects, wear cynicism as if it were sophistication, and treat wonder as something to be outgrown, like milk teeth. The modern mind has become a connoisseur of complaint — exquisite palate, terrible diet. Ingratitude, practised daily, hardens into a philosophy; and a philosophy of ingratitude is just despair wearing reading glasses.

So the cauldron is not made of crimes alone. It is made of shrugs, of eye-rolls, of the ten thousand small refusals to be amazed — more than refusals, obstinate boorishness and appalling stupidity. But here is the thing about cauldrons, the clause the fine print forgot: they have no lids. Nothing seals us in but habit. The exit has always been vertical. The pressure cooker too releases vertical.

The East has known this forever and pressed it into a single flower. The lotus does not rise despite the mud; it rises because of it. The muck is not its shame but its syllabus — every rotting thing at the bottom of the pond becomes fuel for the bloom at the top. The lotus performs, each morning, the most subversive act in nature: it converts filth into fragrance and never once looks embarrassed about its address. The mud, it turns out, was never meant to be a destiny.

And nature, patient teacher that she is, keeps modelling the ascent for us, hoping we will finally take notes. The dawn does not sulk about the night; it simply outgrows it. The monsoon rises from the very sea it once fell into, and returns as a blessing to the fields. Sap climbs a hundred feet of deodar against gravity’s explicit objection. So does the pepper on coffee in Araku. The lark does not check the news before singing. Even the humble kite — that poor man’s aircraft dancing over our terraces — knows the secret: it soars highest when the wind is against it, and only because a faithful string holds it to the earth — rootedness below, audacity above. Everything alive is quietly voting for altitude. Everything, that is, except its most gifted resident — who was engineered for it most of all. Remember your own architecture. The spine was our first cathedral, raised vertebra by vertebra over millennia, from crawl to stride to stargaze. The eyes were installed near the crown, not the heels; the anatomical memo could not be clearer. We look up to pray, up when we hope, up when we love. Rumi wondered why we crawl through life when we were born with wings; one suspects the answer is that crawling asks nothing of us, while wings come with a terrifying clause — use them.

Let us be precise, though, about what rising means, for it is not escape. Rising above the cauldron is not fleeing the kitchen; it is refusing to let the broth name you. It is the widow who plants a garden in her grief. It is the clerk who will not sign the crooked file though the crooked file pays better. It is the child in a torn uniform walking six kilometres to school, carrying the entire future of her village in a second-hand bag. It is choosing, in an age that monetises outrage, the unfashionable luxuries of forgiveness, patience, and awe. History confirms the pattern with almost monotonous kindness: after every darkness we brewed, something great happened. After every collapsed empire, a mother somewhere rebuild her world with two hands and a hymn. Falling is our habit; rising is our signature. We are, for all our sins, the species of the second chance.

And rising is contagious — this is its loveliest property. One person standing tall makes it easier for the next spine to remember itself. Courage, like fragrance, cannot be contained by the flower that made it. A single lamp does not curse the darkness of the whole room; it simply makes the darkness irrelevant, one radius at a time. Behaviour becomes practice, practice becomes culture, culture becomes civilisation. The road from one lifted chin to a lifted age is shorter than we think. It is walkable. It begins at the neck.

So rise. Rise, you magnificent mess of stardust and stubbornness. Rise above the grudge you have been marinating like a family heirloom. Rise above the pettiness that fits so comfortably it feels like a personality. Rise above the cruelty you scroll past, the corruption you call “the system,” the cynicism you call “realism,” the smallness you call “just how I am.” Rise above the cauldron — not around it, not in polite denial of it, but clean above it, the way the lotus files its daily appeal against the mud and wins, every single morning, without a lawyer.

This life — improbable, unrepeatable, outrageously beautiful — was not bestowed upon us to be belittled in instalments. The stars paid for your bones in full. The least we owe them is posture.

.

Charudutta Panigrahi is a thinker and an author. He is a lifelong seeker mapping the ascent of the human spirit through word and work.

.

PLEASE NOTE: ARTICLES CAN ONLY BE REPRODUCED IN OTHER SITES WITH DUE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BORDERLESS JOURNAL

Click here to access Wild Winds: The Borderless Anthology of Poems

Click here to access the Borderless anthology, Monalisa No Longer Smiles

Categories
Opinion

All So Messi!

By Farouk Gulsara

Lionel Messi in Kolkata. From Public Domain

With the amount of information I am bombarded with daily, I often wonder, as one usually does, how all these changes will change society. Are we all going to be empowered, aware, and demanding what is due to us? Will our minds be so open that we can accept that there is more than one way to skin a cat? On the contrary, will we become more aware of the many ways we can be taken for a ride, and so paranoid that we cannot even breathe a breath of fresh air? What if it is contaminated with toxic effluents?

Three recent video clips steered my mind towards this end.

In the first instance, a group of spectators in a stadium in Kolkata went amok. They were seen tearing fences and wrecking stadium chairs and equipment. They had come to see their favourite world-famous footballer, Lionel Messi, interact with fans. Perhaps the organisers had noble intentions that by having these types of exhibitions, more youngsters in India would take up the sport. 

Unfortunately, the events of that day were quite different. It became a façade, with Messi surrounded by multiple VIPs and their entourages, all eager to take selfies from every angle. 

The crowd was furious that the star was interacting only with VIPs, their children, politicians, and their kin. Messi was seen being passed around like a soccer ball to capture that perfect picture that would one day adorn their study. The ordinary spectators were left drooling, unable to get close enough to see Messi’s scoring actions. Messi was then seen joking around with the exclusive group of kids, kicking a few balls before departing. 

The spectators paid good money not to see their hero paraded as a selfie model. They came expecting some action. A show promised to last two hours, but it ended after just half-an-hour when politicians and officials hijacked the event. One trigger, and chaos erupted.

What happened? Were the people in the stadium offended because they felt duped after paying a lot of money to catch glimpses of the hero posing with others and their children, not with them? They believed his appearance was too brief to matter. They thought the wealthy had used the ticket sales for their own pleasures. 

Has Messi’s overexposure in the media led ordinary people to claim ownership of Messi? They believe they have a legitimate right to him. Watching others possess their hero while he is kept outside was too much for them to bear. Meanwhile, they overlook that their own football hero, Sunil Chhetri, reportedly the world’s third-highest goal scorer after Ronaldo and Messi, is ignored. Some Indians do not even know who Chhetri is.

Another reel that reached me showed stranded Indigo passengers having a field day berating the frontliners verbally as thousands of flights were cancelled because the airline could not comply with the new aviation regulations. The reel commentator scolded the passengers for their unruly behaviour. People of a certain stature, well-travelled and well-informed, should not be behaving as they did—loud, abusive, threatening, and insulting the ground staff. The recipients were merely lowly-paid messengers who had no control over operations, yet they bore the brunt of every customer’s insult.

The message further criticises the stranded passengers for losing their composure. They should have behaved with more dignity. In their view, flying is a privilege enjoyed by the educated; hence the need to act ‘cultured’ rather than resort to theatrics. The demonstration exemplified the deep-rooted middle-class mentality that seemed to prevail amongst the nouveau riche.

It is too simplistic to assume this. The rot runs deeper. On one hand, there is a feeling that passengers are being taken for fools. Airlines have recently been cutting corners due to the sharp increase in air travel. With so many new destinations, more flights, and affordability, the airline industry has never been more profitable. Making hay while the sun shines is the airlines’ motto. By squeezing pilots, crew members, and ground staff, the owners have had a field day. Recognising this, those in power tightened regulations to ensure air safety. Sufficient time was given to industry players to make amends. Indigo, holding the lion’s share of India’s air travel market, believed it was above the law. They procrastinated defiantly. That, in short, led to this fiasco.

So, were the passengers justified in their behaviour? Some were attending job interviews, some were about to get married, while others were taking part in equally important, life-changing events. All of it was for nothing because profiteers turned into vultures. There must surely be some etiquette in the business. They should have a minimum level of responsibility to follow the law and ensure safety. Instead, they failed. They killed the golden goose. 

The failure of public relations to provide practical solutions, leaving customers in limbo about how events would unfold, is a recipe for disaster. And it happened.

In Malaysia, nearly every time after a fatal motor vehicle accident, the public is informed that the driver involved in causing death was driving without a valid driving licence, road tax, or had 30 or 40 unpaid summonses. Each time a suspect sustains fatal wounds during car chases, interrogations, or while in custody, the Malaysian public raises concerns. In defence, the police often mention possession of machetes and criminal records related to the deceased, as if their demise is justified and question why the public should mourn a hardened criminal. 

This time, it was different. Police allegedly engaged in a highway car chase and shot three suspects. They soon announced their list of criminal records and provided a summary of the weapons found and the sequence of events. What the police did not know was that the spouse of one of the deceased had recorded her conversation with her partner, and the phone recording continued until after the trigger was pulled. 

A day after the incident, the recording surfaced. The gunshot did not resemble a typical shootout but rather an execution. The postmortem report complicated matters further. The bullet entered the nose and pierced the heart, execution style. 

For so long, the Malaysian public had been told to believe the various narratives about these kinds of deaths. For the first time, telecommunications tools may reveal what actually happens during police chases in the dead of night. Amnesty International has been warning us that our police custodial death rates are alarmingly high. The police have been dragging their feet on the public appeal to set up an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission and to equip their officers with body cameras. 

Is the damning evidence produced by modern devices a turning point in how policing is done in Malaysia? 

Modern life has changed many of our priorities. If, a century ago, the average man was content with decent square meals, enough garments to keep himself and cover the essentials, had a roof over his head and was able to provide for his family, the modern man needs more than that. The world’s modern economy, on the one hand, makes him quite aware of his surroundings. He is cognisant of different ways in which others live their life. On the downside, he has become a little self-centred and hedonistic. Travel to a foreign land has become an essential pastime. His obsession with famous media icons makes him mindlessly parrot his hero. He dresses like them, mimics their mannerisms and worships the Earth they stand on. Not all this work is for the betterment of society.

The fence that separates the elite and the plebeians is crumbling. Certain privileged information was kept from the general public, deemed necessary to ensure peace. Disinformation and uncertainty worked very well to maintain law and order. As information became more widely accessible, we found it helpful to curb abuses of the system. That, however, did not assure peace of mind. As in all things in life, there are two sides to the coin. Even though they may present opposing views, they are actually part of the same coin. The analogy is the same. Humans must learn to accept that everything is a work in progress. Not a single item that Man created has stood the test of time; it has needed constant twirling and re-modelling.

.

Farouk Gulsara is a daytime healer and a writer by night. After developing his left side of his brain almost half his lifetime, this johnny-come-lately decided to stimulate the non-dominant part of his remaining half. An author of two non-fiction books, Inside the twisted mind of Rifle Range Boy and Real Lessons from Reel Life, he writes regularly in his blog, Rifle Range Boy.

PLEASE NOTE: ARTICLES CAN ONLY BE REPRODUCED IN OTHER SITES WITH DUE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BORDERLESS JOURNAL

Click here to access the Borderless anthology, Monalisa No Longer Smiles

Click here to access Monalisa No Longer Smiles on Kindle Amazon International

Categories
Opinion

Cracking Exams?

By Gower Bhat

Nun chai, traditional pink tea from Kashmir. From Public Domain

The father sat across from me in a small tea shop in Srinagar, stirring his cup of nun chai. His face was lined with worry. His daughter had just enrolled in a well-known coaching centre, aiming to crack the NEET exam[1]. “The fees are high,” he said quietly. “We’ve had to dip into our savings. But what choice do we have?”

In Kashmir, the pursuit of higher education has led to a boom in private coaching centres. These institutions promise success in competitive exams, which have become almost essential for aspirants to institutions of higher learning. But this trend has brought significant financial and emotional burdens to families and students alike.

Over the past decade, Kashmir has seen a rapid increase in private coaching centres, especially in Srinagar. The cost of enrolling in these coaching centres is substantial. Fees can range from Rs50,000 to Rs150,000 per year, depending on the course and the institution’s reputation. For many families in the region, this represents a significant portion of their annual income. The financial strain is even greater when multiple children in a family seek such coaching, leading to difficult choices and sacrifices.

In theory, competitive exams are merit-based. But in reality, access to quality coaching has become a deciding factor. This has led to concerns that the system unfairly favours the wealthy. Children from less privileged backgrounds are often unable to afford the coaching necessary to compete, widening the educational divide.

The intense pressure to succeed in these exams takes a toll on students’ mental health. The relentless pursuit of high scores, coupled with the fear of failure, has led to increased anxiety and stress among students. In extreme cases, this pressure has resulted in self-harm or suicidal tendencies, highlighting the tragic dimensions of this educational race.

Another casualty of the coaching culture is the traditional schooling system. Many students attend school just for attendance and exams. The ‘real studying’ is perceived to take place in coaching classes. Some students even drop out of regular schools entirely, enrolling in “dummy” schools that allow them to focus solely on coaching. This shift undermines the holistic development that traditional schooling aims to provide.

Coaching institutes have turned into lucrative businesses. They hire aggressive marketing teams, use toppers’ faces on billboards, and charge extra for “elite” batches. Some teachers in these institutes earn significantly more than professors in universities. The focus has shifted from education to profit, raising concerns about the commercialisation of learning.

The rapid growth of private coaching centres has posed challenges for regulators. Concerns have been raised over the lack of a proper mechanism to regulate fee structures and ensure basic facilities for students. The absence of effective oversight has allowed some centres to prioritize profit over quality education, further exacerbating the issues faced by students and parents.

Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach:

1. Strengthening Public Education: Improving the quality of education in public schools can reduce the dependency on private coaching. This includes enhancing infrastructure, updating curricula, and providing continuous teacher training.

2. Affordable Alternatives: Promoting online educational platforms that offer affordable or free resources can provide students with additional learning support without the hefty price tag associated with traditional coaching centres.

3. Mental Health Support: Integrating counselling services within schools and coaching centres can help students manage stress and build resilience, ensuring their well-being alongside academic pursuits.

4. Community Awareness: Educating parents and students about diverse career paths and the importance of holistic development can shift the focus from a narrow definition of success to a more inclusive one.

For now, parents will keep paying. Students will keep pushing. Coaching centres will keep expanding. And the question will remain—are we cracking an exam, or emptying our bank account?

The burgeoning private coaching industry in Kashmir reflects the aspirations and anxieties of a society striving for educational excellence. Balancing these ambitions with financial realities and mental well-being is crucial. As the region moves forward, a collective effort from educators, policymakers, parents, and students is essential to create an equitable and supportive educational environment.

.

[1] The NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test) is a national entrance examination in India for admission to undergraduate medical programs.

Gowher Bhat is a published author of both fiction and non-fiction, a columnist, freelance journalist, and educator from Kashmir. He writes about memory, place, and the quiet weight of the things we carry, often exploring themes of longing, belonging, silence, and expression. A senior columnist in several local newspapers across the Kashmir Valley, he is also an avid reader and book reviewer. He believes the smallest moments can carry the deepest truths.

.

PLEASE NOTE: ARTICLES CAN ONLY BE REPRODUCED IN OTHER SITES WITH DUE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BORDERLESS JOURNAL

Click here to access the Borderless anthology, Monalisa No Longer Smiles

Click here to access Monalisa No Longer Smiles on Kindle Amazon International